AI Visibility Intelligence

Where Percept Is Winning and Losing AI Buyer Visibility

Brand

Percept

Last updated

2026-04-27

AI influence score for Percept

43

out of 100

Losing ~65% of buyers using AI search

Companies with higher scores are more likely to appear in AI-driven purchases.

Where competitors are beating Percept in AI search

Losing ~65% of buyers using AI search

Percept is missing in 67% of tracked prompts right now. Every missed answer is a likely lost sale.

Where AI already picks you

  • AI already links Percept with Luxury Sector Experience. GroupM does not outrank Percept here.

Where competitors beat you

  • Competitors beat Percept on Audience Segmentation. Publicis is rated strong while Percept is limited.
  • Competitors beat Percept on Brand Strategy Development. GroupM is rated moderate while Percept is limited.
  • Competitors beat Percept on Creative Campaign Development. Publicis is rated strong while Percept is limited.

What to fix first

Close the Audience Segmentation gap before competitors keep owning the recommendation.

Buyers are asking about Audience Segmentation, but your homepage barely explains it. Publicis currently has the stronger AI association.

Publicis is strong here while Percept is limited. Homepage copy barely mentions Audience Segmentation.

How AI compares Percept across buyer and comparison queries

Percept appears in 40% of sampled queries. GroupM appears in 30%.

Confidence: MediumSignal confidence is medium. Trends are useful but should be validated with deeper sampling.
BrandBuyer MentionsComparison MentionsTotal Mentions
Percept Your brand0%100%40%
GroupM17%50%30%
Publicis17%25%20%
Havas17%0%10%

Where competitors still intercept demand

Same underlying gaps, reframed around where competitors still capture buyer demand before Percept gets recommended.

Where AI thinks you win vs lose

Directional view based on current AI response patterns, not a full product benchmark.

AttributePerceptGroupMHavasPublicis
Brand Strategy DevelopmentLimitedModerateLimitedLimited
Creative Campaign DevelopmentLimitedModerateLimitedStrong
Media Planning ServicesLimitedLimitedModerateStrong
Luxury Sector ExperienceModerateLimitedLimitedLimited
Audience SegmentationLimitedLimitedLimitedStrong
Premium Channel PlacementsLimitedLimitedLimitedModerate

Where Percept Is Losing AI Buyers to Competitors

Immediate risk

Percept is absent in 100% of buyer-intent queries while GroupM appears in 30% of tracked prompts.

Prompts you're missing

60%

Buyer query losses

100%

Comparison coverage

100%

Top competitor by mentions

GroupM (30%)

What buyers hear first

AI assistants position Percept as entertainment-specialized with creative storytelling strength, while GroupM dominates on media scale and data analytics; Percept appears in 33% of queries but absent from generic luxury agency searches

Sample-basedCoverage signal

Who AI recommends instead

Comparison queries favor Percept-GroupM pairings over Percept-Havas or Percept-Publicis, suggesting AI models associate Percept primarily with GroupM as the competitive benchmark in Indian market

Sample-basedComparison signal

What you lose if this continues

Percept gains visibility only in direct comparison and HNI-targeting queries; absent from broad enterprise and full-service agency recommendations, indicating positioning gap in general market awareness

Sample-basedComparison signalCoverage signal

Act now

Create dedicated comparison pages: Percept vs GroupM (enterprise scale), Percept vs Havas (creative + data), Percept vs Publicis (entertainment marketing)—ensure these rank for direct comparison queries where Percept currently dominates

Every missed buyer-intent prompt is a competitor recommendation opportunity.

Detailed interpretation
  • AI assistants position Percept as entertainment-specialized with creative storytelling strength, while GroupM dominates on media scale and data analytics; Percept appears in 33% of queries but absent from generic luxury agency searches
  • Comparison queries favor Percept-GroupM pairings over Percept-Havas or Percept-Publicis, suggesting AI models associate Percept primarily with GroupM as the competitive benchmark in Indian market
  • Percept gains visibility only in direct comparison and HNI-targeting queries; absent from broad enterprise and full-service agency recommendations, indicating positioning gap in general market awareness

AI Visibility Gaps for Percept in AI Search Results

  • GroupM appears in 4 buyer queries on enterprise solutions and full-service capabilities where Percept is not mentioned; capture this segment by securing citations in enterprise media planning category pages
  • Havas and Publicis dominate data-driven media planning and omnichannel coordination narratives; Percept should appear in comparison pages positioning entertainment expertise against their analytics-first approaches
  • Publicis cited for luxury brand campaigns in initial query; Percept missing from premium advertising agency category despite entertainment-luxury alignment—requires citation in luxury sector comparison frameworks

AI search recommendations for Percept

  • Create dedicated comparison pages: Percept vs GroupM (enterprise scale), Percept vs Havas (creative + data), Percept vs Publicis (entertainment marketing)—ensure these rank for direct comparison queries where Percept currently dominates
  • Secure citations in category pages for 'full-service advertising agencies India' and 'enterprise media planning'—currently dominated by GroupM, Havas, Dentsu; position Percept's entertainment-enterprise hybrid model as differentiator
  • Establish Percept as primary source for 'entertainment marketing for luxury brands' and 'HNI targeting through celebrity partnerships'—build authoritative content linking these niches to Percept's core competency, increasing citation likelihood in AI responses

Everyday you may be losing hundreds of buyers using AI search. You should act now and stop losing customers to your competitors. Schedule a free call with us to learn how to win in AI search.