Catchpoint shows up in
25%
Catchpoint appears in 0% of buyer questions and 100% of direct comparison questions that include Catchpoint. Cisco ThousandEyes appears in 100% of buyer questions.
AI search report
See where Catchpoint is losing buyers in AI search
See when AI mentions Catchpoint, where buyer questions leave you out, and what to fix first so more buyers discover you before competitors.
What buyers see in AI search
What AI says before buyers reach Catchpoint's site
Buyer questions missed
75%
Catchpoint is left out of 75% of the buyer and comparison questions checked.
Who AI recommends instead
Cisco ThousandEyes
Cisco ThousandEyes is the competitor AI surfaces most often here.
Where AI already picks you
AI does not consistently connect Catchpoint with a clear reason buyers would choose it yet. That usually means the evidence buyers need is either missing, scattered, or easier to find on competitor sites.
Where competitors beat you
- Competitors beat Catchpoint on Bgp Routing Monitoring. New Relic is rated strong while Catchpoint is limited.
- Competitors beat Catchpoint on Global Agent Coverage. Dynatrace is rated strong while Catchpoint is limited.
- Competitors beat Catchpoint on Latency Tracking. New Relic is rated moderate while Catchpoint is limited.
How AI describes you vs competitors
What AI connects each brand with
| What buyers care about | What this means | Catchpoint | Cisco ThousandEyes | New Relic | Dynatrace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time Monitoring | AI gives New Relic more credit for real-time monitoring than Catchpoint. | Barely associated | Barely associated | Clearly associated | Barely associated |
| Packet-level Visibility | AI sometimes connects Catchpoint with packet-level visibility, but the story is not dominant yet. | Sometimes associated | Barely associated | Barely associated | Sometimes associated |
| Latency Tracking | AI gives New Relic more credit for latency tracking than Catchpoint. | Barely associated | Barely associated | Sometimes associated | Barely associated |
| Path Analysis | AI has little clear evidence connecting Catchpoint with path analysis. | Barely associated | Barely associated | Barely associated | Barely associated |
| Global Agent Coverage | AI gives Dynatrace more credit for global agent coverage than Catchpoint. | Barely associated | Barely associated | Barely associated | Clearly associated |
| Bgp Routing Monitoring | AI gives New Relic more credit for bgp routing monitoring than Catchpoint. | Barely associated | Barely associated | Clearly associated | Sometimes associated |
Buyer questions you are missing
The questions where buyers may never see Catchpoint
These are high-intent questions where AI did not mention Catchpoint. Each one can become a clear answer page AI can trust and reuse, supported by evidence from Catchpoint's site.
Buyer question
How can we monitor network performance across our global data centers in real-time?
Catchpoint was not mentioned in this AI answer.
See the AI answerBuyer question
What tools do enterprise IT teams use to track internet performance and identify bottlenecks?
Catchpoint was not mentioned in this AI answer.
See the AI answerBuyer question
We need visibility into our CDN and cloud infrastructure performance - what solutions exist?
Catchpoint was not mentioned in this AI answer.
See the AI answerBuyer question
How do we measure end-user experience and synthetic monitoring for our digital applications?
Catchpoint was not mentioned in this AI answer.
See the AI answerBuyer question
What's the best platform for continuous network observability across multiple regions?
Catchpoint was not mentioned in this AI answer.
See the AI answerBuyer question
How can our operations team get alerts on internet outages and performance degradation before customers notice?
Catchpoint was not mentioned in this AI answer.
See the AI answerWhat to fix first
The shortest path to better AI search presence
Readable turns missed buyer questions into pages AI can trust, clearer evidence buyers can verify, and comparison answers that make it easier for AI tools to recommend you.
Close the Bgp Routing Monitoring gap before competitors keep winning the recommendation.: Buyers are asking about Bgp Routing Monitoring, but your homepage barely explains it. AI answers currently connect New Relic more strongly with that need.
Develop comparison pages positioning Catchpoint against New Relic and Dynatrace for enterprise observability, not just ThousandEyes, to capture visibility in broader APM and multi-layer monitoring discussions
Secure citations in authoritative sources discussing global data center monitoring, multi-region observability, and CDN performance visibility to compete with Kentik and ThousandEyes in infrastructure-focused buyer queries
Create content linking Catchpoint's synthetic monitoring to proactive alerting and operations team workflows, emphasizing early warning capabilities to appear in outage prevention and degradation detection recommendation contexts
Catchpoint is missing from 6 of 6 buyer discovery queries about global data center monitoring, CDN visibility, and multi-region observability where ThousandEyes and Kentik are recommended as primary solutions
What you’ll see in the AI search review
Find the AI answers costing you buyers
In one review, we’ll show where Catchpoint is missing, which competitors AI is recommending instead, and the first pages or evidence updates most likely to help you show up.
The buyer questions where Catchpoint is left out.
The competitor claims AI is repeating instead.
The first fixes most likely to help Catchpoint show up.
Fix the buyer moments AI is missing
We’ll show you which AI answers are costing you buyers and what to publish first.
Bring this report to a short review with Readable. You will leave knowing the buyer questions, evidence gaps, and answer pages that matter most.
Improve my AI visibility