Where AI already picks you
This sample does not show a strong attribute lead yet.
AI Visibility Intelligence
Where Smilejet Is Winning and Losing AI Buyer Visibility
Category: Analytics & Data · Last analyzed: 2026-04-04
Smilejet AI visibility score
43
out of 100
Losing ~58% of buyers using AI search
Companies with higher scores are more likely to appear in AI-driven purchases.
Where AI already picks Smilejet and where competitors win
Losing ~58% of buyers using AI search
Smilejet is missing in 67% of tracked prompts right now. Every missed answer is a likely lost sale.
Where competitors beat you
- Competitors beat Smilejet on Cohort Analysis. Microsoft Clarity is rated strong while Smilejet is limited.
What to fix first
Close the Cohort Analysis gap before competitors keep owning the recommendation.
Buyers are asking about Cohort Analysis, but your homepage barely explains it. Microsoft Clarity currently has the stronger AI association.
Microsoft Clarity is strong here while Smilejet is limited. Homepage copy barely mentions Cohort Analysis.
How AI tools evaluate Smilejet across buyer and comparison queries
Smilejet appears in 40% of sampled queries. Hotjar appears in 30%.
Confidence: MediumSignal confidence is medium. Trends are useful but should be validated with deeper sampling.
| Brand | Buyer Mentions | Comparison Mentions | Total Mentions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smilejet Your brand | 0% | 100% | 40% |
| Hotjar | 17% | 50% | 30% |
| Crazy Egg | 17% | 25% | 20% |
| Microsoft Clarity | 17% | 25% | 20% |
Where competitors still intercept demand
Same underlying gaps, reframed around where competitors still capture buyer demand before Smilejet gets recommended.
Buyer
heatmap and session recording tool for UX optimization
Competitor leading: Hotjar
Create a buyer-intent page aligned to this query so Smilejet appears in discovery results.
Where AI thinks you win vs lose
Directional view based on current AI response patterns, not a full product benchmark.
| Attribute | Smilejet | Hotjar | Crazy Egg | Microsoft Clarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event Tracking | ||||
| Funnel Analysis | ||||
| User Segmentation | ||||
| Cohort Analysis | ||||
| Session Recording | ||||
| Heatmap Visualization |
AI Buyer-Search Losses for Smilejet vs Competitors
Immediate risk
Smilejet is absent in 100% of buyer-intent queries while Hotjar appears in 30% of tracked prompts.
Prompts you're missing
60%
Buyer query losses
100%
Comparison coverage
100%
Top competitor by mentions
Hotjar (30%)
What buyers hear first
Smilejet achieves 33% visibility in comparison queries but is absent from buyer intent queries, indicating strong positioning only when directly compared to competitors rather than organic discovery.
Sample-basedBuyer-intent signalComparison signal
Who AI recommends instead
AI assistants position Smilejet primarily on price competitiveness and streamlined features rather than technical capabilities, creating a budget-tier perception versus feature-rich alternatives like Hotjar.
Sample-based
What you lose if this continues
Hotjar dominates narrative positioning with mentions of advanced filtering, integrations, and market establishment, while Smilejet lacks attributed differentiation on specific capabilities like event tracking or funnel analysis.
Sample-based
Act now
Create dedicated comparison pages emphasizing Smilejet's design customization and UX-specific features to compete in the 'heatmap and session recording' category where Smilejet currently has zero mentions.
Every missed buyer-intent prompt is a competitor recommendation opportunity.
Detailed interpretation
- Smilejet achieves 33% visibility in comparison queries but is absent from buyer intent queries, indicating strong positioning only when directly compared to competitors rather than organic discovery.
- AI assistants position Smilejet primarily on price competitiveness and streamlined features rather than technical capabilities, creating a budget-tier perception versus feature-rich alternatives like Hotjar.
- Hotjar dominates narrative positioning with mentions of advanced filtering, integrations, and market establishment, while Smilejet lacks attributed differentiation on specific capabilities like event tracking or funnel analysis.
Smilejet visibility gaps in AI search results
- Smilejet is completely absent from the 'heatmap and session recording tool for UX optimization' buyer query where Hotjar, Crazy Egg, and Microsoft Clarity are all mentioned—this is a critical discovery gap.
- Event tracking, funnel analysis, and cohort analysis queries default to Amplitude and Mixpanel; Smilejet could capture small business and budget-conscious segments by appearing in 'growth analytics platform for small business' comparisons.
- Microsoft Clarity's free tier positioning in UX/UI designer queries creates an opening for Smilejet to establish design-focused feature parity claims in comparison pages targeting designers and small teams.
Where AI mentions Smilejet in buyer and comparison queries
AI Search Optimization Recommendations for Smilejet
- Create dedicated comparison pages emphasizing Smilejet's design customization and UX-specific features to compete in the 'heatmap and session recording' category where Smilejet currently has zero mentions.
- Develop citation-worthy content on Smilejet's event tracking and funnel analysis capabilities for small business use cases, targeting inclusion in growth analytics and SaaS behavior analysis queries alongside Mixpanel and Amplitude.
- Establish Smilejet as the 'design-first analytics' alternative in comparison pages against Microsoft Clarity and Crazy Egg, highlighting customization options and design team workflows to shift positioning beyond price-only differentiation.
Everyday you may be losing hundreds of buyers using AI search. You should act now and stop losing customers to your competitors. Schedule a free call with us to learn how to win in AI search.